[To learn English] In United States v. Heppner, Judge Jed Rakoff of the Southern District of New York held that communications with a publicly available generative AI platform are not protected by the attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine. Heppner is a criminal case that involves a defendant's interactions with AI during a time when the defendant is under criminal investigation and preparing materials to provide to his counsel. Despite that narrow application Heppner's reasoning has significant implications beyond the facts of that case. Heppner holds that the defendant's communications with AI software were "not confidential." 在美国Heppner一案中，纽约南区联邦法院法官 Jed Rakoff 裁定，与公开可用的生成式人工智能（AI）平台进行的交流，不受“律师-当事人特权”或“工作成果原则”的保护。 Heppner刑事案件，涉及被告在接受刑事调查期间，为向其辩护律师提供材料而与 AI 进行互动的情形。尽管该案的适用范围看似狭窄，但 Heppner案中的推理逻辑具有深远的意义，其影响已超越了该案的具体事实范畴。Heppner 案裁定，被告与 AI 软件之间的交流属于“非保密”性质。 LearnEnglishLeave a remark